All applications
Operations analyst checking a flagged response against a source document.
Home services & trades · Construction · Landscaping & grounds · Automotive & repair · Cleaning & facilities · Manufacturing · Distribution & logistics · Retail & multi-location · Professional services · Corporate operations

AI incident handling

We set up a reporting and response process for unexpected AI behavior. It brings the original input, output, relevant source, and workflow version into one restricted incident record. AI can organize that evidence; the responsible people decide the response.

How we put it to work

  1. Make a problem easy to report.

    We add a reporting route with the affected workflow and a reference to the problematic result. Available evidence is preserved with appropriate access and retention controls rather than copied into an unrestricted inbox.

    Your teamChecks urgency and decides whether to pause the workflow.

    Make a problem easy to report. We add a reporting route with the affected workflow and a reference to the problematic result. Available evidence is preserved with appropriate access and retention controls rather than copied into an unrestricted inbox.
    Issue reported
    Workflow reference
    AI
    Affected result
    Assigned owner
  2. Separate evidence from assumptions.

    AI prepares a timeline from available records and highlights conflicting or missing evidence. Reviewers distinguish a source problem, configuration issue, or unsupported output; a summary is not a finding of cause.

    Your teamDetermines impact, cause, and any communication or specialist review required.

    A reported error becomes an investigation. Illustrative response complaint: Unsupported delivery promise; Original answer retained; Source date missing. AI structures the incident evidence and open questions.: Promise flagged; Evidence linked; Owner investigating. People determine impact and approve the response.
    A reported error becomes an investigation
    Illustrative response complaint · Illustrative example
    Source record
    Unsupported delivery promise
    Original answer retained
    Source date missing
    AI retrieves the evidence
    Promise flagged
    Evidence linked
    Owner investigating
    Source attached
    AI structures the incident evidence and open questions.
    People determine impact and approve the response
  3. Verify the correction before resuming.

    We record the proposed fix and replay relevant test cases. The owner reviews the results, approves recovery, and schedules a follow-up check. Unresolved issues remain open.

    Your teamApproves release and confirms the incident can be closed.

    Verify the correction before resuming. We record the proposed fix and replay relevant test cases. The owner reviews the results, approves recovery, and schedules a follow-up check. Unresolved issues remain open.
    Recovery review
    AI
    Proposed fix
    Test results
    Resume decision

What your first engagement includes

  1. 01Review your setupConfirm existing features, data access, and system compatibility.
  2. 02Configure one workflowConnect the tools, define approvals, and handle exceptions.
  3. 03Test and hand overPilot on selected work, train your staff, and provide operating instructions.
PILOT REVIEW

How we measure the pilot

Compare the same work before and during the pilot.

  • Time to complete

    Time from a reported issue to an assigned response, including the human check.

    Review time
  • Review quality

    How often a draft needs a material correction before approval.

    Correction rate
  • Workflow reliability

    Incidents closed without evidence of a checked correction.

    Exceptions to resolve
  1. Current process
  2. Pilot results
  3. Review together

Agree what to improve or expand based on the results.

Start with one workflow in your business.

Swipe to explore 1 / 3